Thursday, February 18, 2010

Kosovo Marks 2nd Anniversary Of Independence

       

Tuesday, February 16, 2010

Glenn Beck Gets It Wrong On Lincoln Part 2



In the second half of the interview with Lewis E. Lerhman, the conversation continues with Beck declaring that the Constitution is a "suicide pact."  Apparently he has it on good authority, we are led to believe, as this is what Lincoln's war allegedly "settled."  Thus the "union" is to be maintained by bayonet point as Beck declares "there's no way out."

I find much to like about the Glenn Beck show, but in this case, the line of reasoning employed is pure sophistry.  Secession was a known and accepted mechanism by the founding generation, to be used in  cases of governmental tyranny.  Force should never be the arbiter for deciding issues of principle.  But by suggesting that the issue has been settled by war, this is exactly the idea that Beck advances. 

Glenn Beck Gets It Wrong On Lincoln



For some time now, I have been watching with passive interest,  the Glenn Beck show.  The main reason for this was due to its emphasis on historical and Constitutional matters.  How did we get here, and what would the founders think of our current situation.  This being in counter distinction to other programing that typically focuses mainly with contemporary politics.  Beck typically places the blame for our overreaching federal government on the policies instituted by Woodrow Wilson and F.D.R.  I had been waiting with bated breath for Beck to mention the actions of Lincoln during the WBTS in hastening the arrival of our current leviathan state.   

On last nights program there was an interesting exchange between Beck and a guest author Lewis E. Lehrman regarding Lincoln.   Some of the comments I found problematic,  as they both were in agreement on giving Lincoln a complete pass on  his many Constitutional violations.  Lehrman made several assertions such as the following:

" The states had certain rights delegated to them by the Constitution." 

This is simply false as the states do not derive their rights from the Constitution.  Rights are inherent and not subject to  governmental approval.   Furthermore, the Constitution cannot delegate rights precisely because it is the creation of the statesIt is the relation between a superior and an inferior.  This is of course the whole nature of sovereignty.   Lehrman continues:

"The federal government had certain rights delegated to them." 

This is true as far as it goes, but it is important to remember that the "delegated rights", proceed not from the Constitution but from the states and the people.  It is also true that these are not "rights" as such, but rather delegated, "powers."  Lehrman:

"Lincoln embraced the rights of states."

There are so many problems with this statement that one scarcely knows where to begin.  Clearly, Lincoln didn't believe in the fundamental sovereignty of the states, or in the idea of consent of the governed.  More to come in a follow up post. 




Monday, February 15, 2010

The Hunt For Red October?

It turns out that truth really is stranger than fiction.  The CIA has finally admitted after 30 years of denials, the details of "Project Azorian", a daring mission to recover a Soviet nuclear submarine that sunk off the coast of Hawaii in 1968.  Story here.

De-Christianizing Kosovo

In the postmodern world that we find ourselves in,  the social model most idealized by the elite class is  the notion of multiculturalism.  Despite all this talk of the joys of living in a multicultural society; the remaining Christian Serbs (and other minorities) in Kosovo, have yet to be afforded the blessings of living in such a pluralistic society.  Ironically, the ongoing persecution of minorities in Kosovo is happening under the full knowledge of NATO countries including the United States and Great Britain. Story here.   

Who's Day Is It Anyway?

Saturday, February 13, 2010